See the New Mad Sociologist at http://madsociologistblog.wordpress.com

We spend thousands on a piece of paper…uh…I mean on an education! or The Bradbury Curriculum

Ray

Ray Bradbury is one of my heroes.  He’s one of the few public individuals I would love to meet. (Unfortunately, he has his heart set on Bo Derek…can’t say as I blame him). Today, in the New York Times, I heard Mr. Bradbury say he doesn’t believe in colleges or universities.  He believes in libraries!

He summarized my feelings exactly.  As college tuition rises, and access to a higher education is either out of reach or subsidized by the taxpayer, libraries all over the country are in danger of being shut down due to eroding tax bases. Ray Bradbury explained how he “graduated from the library.” His curriculum: going to the library three days a week and reading everything. There are no stats for how many people are currently following the Bradbury curriculum, but there’s plenty of history of very important people who did so.  College was out of reach.  People like Bradbury wanted to learn.  So they did so at the public library.

Indeed, every semester I ask my students why they are sitting in my class listening to me ramble on about stuff that, really, only I think is interesting.  “To get an education?” No! To get three points added to their transcript.  Their goal is to get credentialed, not to get an education.  If they wanted an education, they would be better off following the Bradbury Curriculum.  It would certainly be cheaper.

And that’s the weakness of the Bradbury Curriculum. Try to put on your resume that you’ve read every book in your public library.  So what. We really are not interested in your “knowledge” your “drive” your “curiosity” or your “potential.” We want to know that you have the self discipline and the conformity to get through a pre-established routine in which you learn what other people think is important.  Then you have a piece of paper that clearly states that you conformed to institutional norms to such a degree that you earned the credential that you were working toward. What you know is irrelevant.

And for this, this piece of paper, you will pay as much at least $25,000!

It’s true that there are some invaluable resources in public colleges and universities.  There you have access to experts in their fields, hands on resources and practice that you cannot get in the library, and the ability to create networks within your career.  If you are lucky, as I was, you’ll encounter professors who may open different perspectives and worldviews that you might not have had access to otherwise.  But for your money, learning is not necessarily the function of a college or university.  Today an “education” is synonymous with a degree, a piece of paper that legitimizes your credentials.  And without this piece of paper, your access to life chances are limited.

After completing my graduate work I was encouraged by many of my professors to continue on into post-graduate work.  Part of me wanted to do it, but only part of me.  The other part of me was hesitant.  I remember the hoops I had to jump through, with the help of my Committee Chair, Dr. Laurel Graham, to get my masters thesis approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB).  This was a board, consisting of a handful of scholars (none of whom were sociologists, by the way), whose job it was to decide what constituted “legitimate” knowledge.  If my work conformed to their ideas of real science, then I would have no problems pursuing my academic ends; if, however, my ideas were too innovative, to different, or did not fall under the assumptions of legitimate knowledge then I was stuck.  I learned that colleges and universities do not encourage thinking and learning, they restrict it, regiment it, shape it into a prescribed, institutional definition of knowledge. I decided that I would rather pursue independent scholarship–The Bradbury Curriculum.

I have plenty of time to reflect, in in some ways regret, this decision.  Not having the piece of paper that declares that I have conformed enough to merit a doctorate degree has certainly limited my prospects for employment in higher education.  This, in turn, has limited my ability to do independent scholarship.  Tremendous social forces are at work to delegitimize independent thought.  And to gain access to legitimate knowledge institutions, one must pay–and pay more now than ever.

College Tuition

Will contemporary Bradburys be able to compete in a world that associates the possession of a piece of parchment with “education?” How can we incorporate the Bradbury Curriculum into a legitimized educational standing?

__________________

Photo of Mr. Bradbury: New York Times Ethan Pines

6 Responses

  1. You’ve really helped me undetsrand the issues. Thanks.

    5. December 2016 at 04:39

  2. Information is power and now I’m a !@#$ing dictator.

    14. December 2016 at 15:43

  3. Jack Weatherford’s (2005) presents a pretty complex and nuanced picture of the Great Kahn. Weatherford says Genghis practiced religious toleration, funded universal public education, established a reliable post office, and was otherwise a fairly “progressive” figure. I look forward to reading Valevicius’s paper.

    17. January 2017 at 22:40

  4. First off, I just have to say The Levroni report is absolutely awesome. I mean getting a chance to interact with a legend like yourself seldom occurs. Your progress has been nothing short of amazing, truly inspirational. Its always exciting, when someone makes a comeback to the sport after a period of absence.Finally that was a very nice story and just to add to that, there is nothing greater than being able to bless someone in any way/form possible.God Bless

    8. February 2017 at 11:14

  5. Sep02 I have got one recommendation for your weblog. It appears like right now there are a couple of cascading stylesheet problems when launching a number of web pages within google chrome and firefox. It is functioning alright in internet explorer. Probably you can double check that.

    11. February 2017 at 09:41

  6. Reputable accommodation establishments, such as ours, particularly in the non hotel sector, will always provide prospective visitors with the terms and conditions of booking on the website. With international feedback sites such as Tripadvisor available, any guests who feel cheated can leave very visible feedback. It would be foolish indeed for any accommodation establishment to engage in sharp practice which could damage their reputation on the Internet, as it will soon become known.

    8. May 2017 at 11:31

Leave a Reply to http://www./ Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>